registrar

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 30, 2023 No Comments

This post is about seven trademarks and their journey from owner to liquidator then to wrongful owner and then again back to the liquidator. This post proves that how people…

act advocate applicant application brand defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions grounds high court Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle Registrar rights trademark

Registrar of trade marks should mandatorily provide grounds of refusal of trade mark application to the applicant, Delhi High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 25, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of:- Intellectual Property Attorneys ……Petitioner Versus The Controller General of Patents, Designs, & Trade marks & Anr. ….Respondents Date of Order:- 16.10.2019 Reason for Petition The petitioner…

acronym advertisement advocate application book confusingly consumer copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence goods high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off petitoner plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 18, 2023 No Comments

M/S.RSPL HEALTH PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Petitioner Versus RECKITT AND COLMAN (OVERSEAS) HYGIENE HOME LIMITED & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 22.08.2023 HARPIC DRAINXPERT VERSUS XPERT There were two rectification…

advocate affidavit application brand copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain evidence gogia goods high court injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website well known mark

Documentary Evidence is enough to declare a trademark as a well known mark, affidavit is not mandatory, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 11, 2023 No Comments

KAMDHENU LTD ….. Appellant Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ….. Respondent Date of the Order:- 06.07.2023 APPELLANT STORY:- The Appellant’s story is that appellant is a company, incorporated as…

registrar

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

Registrar of trade marks should mandatorily provide grounds of refusal of trade mark application to the applicant, Delhi High Court

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS