highcourt

Supreme Court on passing off, acquiescence and cross examination.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 17, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of :- Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited …..Appellants versus Yashwantrao Mohite Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ………Respondents Date of Order:-04.09.2023 STORY LINE:- The appellant–plaintiff was engaged in…

advocate affidavit application brand complaint copyright court damages decree defendant delhi duplcate Gujarat Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle Registrar search seizure services similar trademark well known mark

Opinion of Registrar of Trademarks is mandatory for Police search & seizure raid on duplicate products,Gujarat High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 14, 2023 0Comment

MIHIR SURENDRABHAI SHAH …..Petitioner Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & others ……Respondents Date of Order:- 31.07.2023 What the Petition is all about ? That the petitioner was in business of selling…

advocate application brand copyright court damages defendant domain facebook group high court injunction judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle plaintiff trademark website

Dispute over Ownership of facebook group does not amount to Intellectual property dispute, Bombay High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 12, 2023 0Comment

The Himalayan Club ..Appellant/Applicant Versus Kanwar B. Singh & Ors. ..Respondents Date of the order:- 24.03.2023 REASON FOR APPEAL The present appeal was filed in Bombay High Court against the…

advocate complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions fake garments high court infringement Intellectual Property law lawyer legal lexeagle Madras order petitoner respondent

Sec 63 of Copyright Act does not apply to counterfeit garments etc, Madras High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 3, 2023 0Comment

Chain Singh & Sujan Singh ….Petitioners Versus State & anr. …..Respondent Date of Order:- 07.06.2023 Reason for Filing Petition The petition was filed in Hon’ble Madras High Court , to…

court high court law legal lexeagle

Live-in-relationship shall only be considered as normal after the institution of marriage becomes obsolete in India, Allahabad High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate September 2, 2023 0Comment

Adnan ….Applicant Versus State Of U.P. ……Opposite Party Order dated:- 29.08.2023 Basis :-Adnan filed a bail application, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case No. 156 of…

highcourt

Supreme Court on passing off, acquiescence and cross examination.

Opinion of Registrar of Trademarks is mandatory for Police search & seizure raid on duplicate products,Gujarat High Court.

Sec 63 of Copyright Act does not apply to counterfeit garments etc, Madras High Court

Live-in-relationship shall only be considered as normal after the institution of marriage becomes obsolete in India, Allahabad High Court.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS