directions

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 13, 2023 No Comments

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, CHANDIGARH ….. Appellant Versus M/S KUANTUM PAPERS LTD. ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 16.08.2023 This was an Income Tax appeal concerning Assessment Year (AY)…

advocate brand copyright court cyber damages decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain email gogia high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off trademark website

Rs.2 Crore awarded to Adobe as damages against habitual cyber squatter and domain name infringer by Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 9, 2023 No Comments

ADOBE, INC ….. Plaintiff Versus NAMASE PATEL AND OTHERS ….. Defendants Date of the order:- 29.11.2022 PLAINITFF’S INTRO Plaintiff was founded in 1982 and it is the second largest US…

advocate artificial Bhagvad Geeta book brand complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain fake gogia high court infringement Intellectual Property intelligence law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order plaintiff trademark Whatsapp youtube

Original interpretation by Authors of ancient scpritures can be protected under copyright act, Delhi High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 7, 2023 No Comments

THE BHAKTIVEDANTA BOOK TRUST, INDIA ….Plaintiff Versus HTTPS://BHAGAVATAM.IN/#GSC.TAB=0 & ORS. ….Defendants Date of Order:- 21.09.2023 The Plaintiff in the present case was – Bhaktivedanta Book Trust which is a trust…

advocate brand cheating complaint court defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain fake food high court infringement Intellectual Property law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order plaintiff summons trademark

Delhi High Court grants Permanent Injunction to Domino Pizza in a Trademark Infringement case

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 4, 2023 No Comments

DOMINOS IP HOLDER LLC & ANR. …..Plaintiffs Versus MS DOMINICK PIZZA & ANR. …..Defendants Date of Order:- 26.09.2023 Who were Plaintiffs and what was their relation ? Plaintiff 1 was…

advocate complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions fake garments high court infringement Intellectual Property law lawyer legal lexeagle Madras order petitoner respondent

Sec 63 of Copyright Act does not apply to counterfeit garments etc, Madras High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 3, 2023 No Comments

Chain Singh & Sujan Singh ….Petitioners Versus State & anr. …..Respondent Date of Order:- 07.06.2023 Reason for Filing Petition The petition was filed in Hon’ble Madras High Court , to…

advocate bank cheating copyright court delhi delhihighcourt directions domain fake franchise high court infringement Intellectual Property intelligence law lawyer legal lexeagle order plaintiff trademark

Fake Franchise seller of Trademark ‘Burger King’ restrained by Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 2, 2023 No Comments

BURGER KING CORPORATION …..Plaintiff Versus SWAPNIL PATIL & ORS. …..Defendants Date of the Order:- 15.09.2023 Who is the plaintiff? Plaintiff- Burger King Corporation seeking protection of its marks ‘BURGER KING’…

advocate cheating complaint court delhi delhihighcourt directions gogia high court law lawyer legal lexeagle marriage rape Whatsapp

Delhi High Court issued guildelines for trial/District courts, while granting bail to accused.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate September 24, 2023 No Comments

xxxxx ….Petitioner Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ……Respondents Order Dated:- 13.09.2023 REASON FOR FILING PRESENT PETITION The present petition was filed u/s 482 of the Code…

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Rs.2 Crore awarded to Adobe as damages against habitual cyber squatter and domain name infringer by Delhi High Court.

Original interpretation by Authors of ancient scpritures can be protected under copyright act, Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court grants Permanent Injunction to Domino Pizza in a Trademark Infringement case

Sec 63 of Copyright Act does not apply to counterfeit garments etc, Madras High Court

Fake Franchise seller of Trademark ‘Burger King’ restrained by Delhi High Court.

Delhi High Court issued guildelines for trial/District courts, while granting bail to accused.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS