application

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate April 1, 2024 No Comments

WESTERN INFRABUILD PRODUCTS LLP ….. Plaintiff Versus M/S. WESTERN STEEL INDIA & ANR. … Defendants Date of Order:- 05.01.2022 JOINT SETTLEMENT APPLICATION BY PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT The settlement application was…

acronym act actor advocate affidavit Appeal applicant application assets brand Confidential copyright court cyber damages decree deed defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions duplicate evidence goods goodwill grounds hearing high court Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo online order passing off personality petitoner plaintiff prima facie Registrar registry rights trademark writ

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 30, 2023 No Comments

This post is about seven trademarks and their journey from owner to liquidator then to wrongful owner and then again back to the liquidator. This post proves that how people…

act Appeal applicant application brand confusingly consumer court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions duplicate fake generic goods goodwill grounds hearing high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo medicine online order passing off plaintiff Registrar respondent rights services similar trademark

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 28, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- SUN PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES LTD. ….. Appellant Versus HETERO HEALTHCARE LTD. & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 26.08.2022 APPEAL BEFORE DOUBLE BENCH OF HON’BLE DELHI…

act advocate applicant application brand defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions grounds high court Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle Registrar rights trademark

Registrar of trade marks should mandatorily provide grounds of refusal of trade mark application to the applicant, Delhi High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 25, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of:- Intellectual Property Attorneys ……Petitioner Versus The Controller General of Patents, Designs, & Trade marks & Anr. ….Respondents Date of Order:- 16.10.2019 Reason for Petition The petitioner…

advocate affidavit application brand copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain evidence gogia goods high court injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website well known mark

Documentary Evidence is enough to declare a trademark as a well known mark, affidavit is not mandatory, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 11, 2023 No Comments

KAMDHENU LTD ….. Appellant Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ….. Respondent Date of the Order:- 06.07.2023 APPELLANT STORY:- The Appellant’s story is that appellant is a company, incorporated as…

application

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

Registrar of trade marks should mandatorily provide grounds of refusal of trade mark application to the applicant, Delhi High Court

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS