appeal

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 28, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of :- SUN PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES LTD. ….. Appellant Versus HETERO HEALTHCARE LTD. & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 26.08.2022 APPEAL BEFORE DOUBLE BENCH OF HON’BLE DELHI…

act advocate affidavit Appeal applicant application brand court delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt email gogia high court Intellectual Property intelligence judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order petitoner plaintiff Registrar rights served summons trademark

U/s 143 of Trade Mark Act, there is No legal compulsion on applicant or opponent to provide email id to Trademark office, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 27, 2023 0Comment

M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD. 9TH KILOMETER, MEX ESTATE, PATHANKOT ROAD, JALANDHAR ….. Appellant Versus VIKRAM SURI TRADING AS M/S ARMEX AUTO INDUSTRIES ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 13.10.2023 An…

advocate affidavit application assessment assets brand copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence high court Income tax Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order petitoner respondent services tax trademark

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 13, 2023 0Comment

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, CHANDIGARH ….. Appellant Versus M/S KUANTUM PAPERS LTD. ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 16.08.2023 This was an Income Tax appeal concerning Assessment Year (AY)…

appeal

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

U/s 143 of Trade Mark Act, there is No legal compulsion on applicant or opponent to provide email id to Trademark office, Delhi High Court.

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS