1.DABUR INDIA LIMITED …..Plaintiff
ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS …..Defendants
2.TATA SKY LIMITED …..Plaintiff
S G ENTERPREISES – TATA SKY SALES AND SERVICES AND ORS. ….. Defendants
3.COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs
NIXI & ANR. ….. Defendants
4.MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE PVT. LTD…… Plaintiff
KUMAR PRAHLAD & ANR. ….. Defendants
5.ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED & ANR. ….. Plaintiff
WWW.ULTRATECHCEMENTS.COM & ORS. ….. Defendants
6.MONTBLANC SIMPLO GMBH ….. Plaintiff
MONTBLANCINDIA.COM & ORS. ….. Defendants
7.JOCKEY INTERNATIONAL INC. ….. Plaintiff
WWW.JOCKEYFRANCHISE.COM & ORS. ….. Defendants
8.INDIAMART INTERMESH LIMITED …. Plaintiff
MR. AKASH VERMA & ORS. ….. Defendants
9.MCDONALDS CORPORATION & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs
NATIONAL INTERNET EXCHANGE OF INDIA & ORS. …Defendants
10.ITC LIMITED ….. Plaintiff
ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. ….. Defendants
11. SHOPPERS STOP LIMITED ….. Plaintiff
M/S SHOPPERSTOP & ORS. ….. Defendants
12.MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs
PCPATCHERS TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED
13. THE HIMALAYA DRUG COMPANY & ORS. ….. Plaintiffs
ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. ….. Defendants
14. GODREJ PROPERTIES LTD ….. Plaintiff
ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. ….. Defendants
15. SNAPDEAL PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Plaintiff
GODADDYCOM LLC AND ORS ….. Defendants
16.MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs
TECH HERACLES OPC PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ….. Defendants
17. TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs
M/S ELECTRO INTERNATIONAL & ORS. ….. Defendants
18. HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED ….. Plaintiff
NITIN KUMAR SINGH & ORS. ….. Defendants
19. KAMDHENU LIMITED ….. Plaintiff
RAGHUNATH VIRDHARAM BISHNOI AND ORS. …. Defendants
20. HT MEDIA LTD ….. Plaintiff
POOJA SHARMA & ORS. ….. Defendants
21. KAJARIA CERAMICS LIMITED ….. Plaintiff
GODADDY.COM LLC & ORS. ….. Defendant
22. MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR. ….. Plaintiff
VACATION RENTAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
& ORS. ….. Defendants
23.BAJAJ FINACE LTD & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs
NIKO DAS & ANR. ….. Defendants
24. HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs
UNILEVERR1.IN & ORS. ….. Defendants
25. AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs
AMAZONBUYS.IN & ORS. ….. Defendants
26. FASHNEAR TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Plaintiff
MEESHO ONLINE SHOPPING PVT. LTD. & ANR. ….. Defendants
27. GUJARAT COOPERATIVE MILK MARKETING FEDERATION
LTD & ANR. ….. Plaintiff
AMUL-FRANCHISE.IN & ORS. ….. Defendant
28. BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED ….. Plaintiff
REGISTRANT OF WWW.BAJAJ-FINSERVE.ORG & ORS. ….. Defendants
29. XIAOMI TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ….. Plaintiff
WWW.XIAOMI-INDIA.XYZ & ORS. ….. Defendants
30. BURGER KING CORPORATION ….. Plaintiff
SWAPNIL PATIL & ORS. ….. Defendants
31.INFINITI RETAIL LIMITED ….. Plaintiff
M/S CROMA WHOLESELLER & ORS. ….. Defendants
32. CRESSET CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs
REGISTRANT OF WWW.CRESSETCAPITAL.IN ,
WWW.CRESSETINDIALIVE.LIVE & ORS. ….. Defendants
These 32 batch matters were clubbed togethert in relation to domain names being registered by unknown third parties infringing trademark right of various brand owners and implementation of court orders by the Domain Name Registrars (‘DNR’). From time to time, various directions were passed by Delhi High Court in respect of blocking and locking of the infringing domain names, and implementation of court orders by various DNRs which may or may not be located in India.
On this date, Delhi Police placed on record a written note of arguments in respect of the challenges faced by the Cyber Cell of the Delhi Police in investigation. The said challenges are as under:
i. Delay by Banks in replying to emails and information sought
by the Cyber Cell.
ii. Domain Name Registrars (DNRs) and intermediaries who are hosting the website not providing proper details of the
Registrants in respect of cloud services and other services
availed by them.
iii. Use of VOIP,VPN, etc. by fraudsters to avoid detection.
iv. Non-providing of information by Google even though fake
websites have booked AdWords through Google Ads
programme.
Notices to Banks by Delhi High Court was issued after the stand of the Cyber Cell, Delhi Police to the nominated counsels of all the banks who were nominated by Delhi High Court, so as to evolve a method for ensuring that queries by the police authorities are replied to in a diligent and efficient manner, as
it involved innocent customers being duped of substantial sums of money.
Google LLC was directed to nominate one official who would communicate with the Cyber Cell, Delhi Police and provide them the information that they would need in respect of the fraudulent websites and render any other cooperation that may be needed to investigate the cases.
In CS(COMM)-303/2022, Delhi police Counsel submits that the request has been sent for information from Mumbai Police as on 19th September, 2023. Status report was of that infortmation was asked to be placed on record by the Hon’ble Court.
Next date in these matters now is 24th November, 2023.
Read, Reveiwed & Edited by
Neeraj Gogia, Advocate