services

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate November 18, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED …..APPELLANTS Versus KARANVEER SINGH CHHABRA TRADING AS J.K. ENTERPRISES …..RESPONDENT Date of the Order: – 03.11.2023 REASON FOR FILING THE…

act Appeal applicant application brand confusingly consumer court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions duplicate fake generic goods goodwill grounds hearing high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo medicine online order passing off plaintiff Registrar respondent rights services similar trademark

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 28, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- SUN PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES LTD. ….. Appellant Versus HETERO HEALTHCARE LTD. & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 26.08.2022 APPEAL BEFORE DOUBLE BENCH OF HON’BLE DELHI…

act advocate affidavit applicant application brand complaint court delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions hearing judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle online order petitoner plaintiff Registrar respondent services trademark

Directions issued by Delhi High Court for proper Mechanism to conduct, online hearing at Trademark office.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 26, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- PAWANDEEP SINGH ….. Petitioner Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of order:-23.03.2022 Writ filed by applicant of trademark,as his trademark application…

advertisement advocate affidavit agreement application assets brand Confidential confusingly consumer copyright court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions evidence fake goods high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle order passing off plaintiff services supreme court trademark website

Cross Examination through Video Conferencing allowed by Delhi High Court in IPR cases/ Commercial Disputes for overseas & outstation witness.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 21, 2023 No Comments

In the matters of:- INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV …..Petitioner Versus QUESS CORP LIMITED …..Respondent With M/S QUESS CORP LTD …..Petitioner Versus M/S INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV …..Respondent Date of Order:-…

acronym advertisement advocate application book confusingly consumer copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence goods high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off petitoner plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 18, 2023 No Comments

M/S.RSPL HEALTH PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Petitioner Versus RECKITT AND COLMAN (OVERSEAS) HYGIENE HOME LIMITED & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 22.08.2023 HARPIC DRAINXPERT VERSUS XPERT There were two rectification…

advocate application brand Confidential copyright court damages decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off plaintiff services similar trademark

No Trademark, ad interim Injunction-without hearing the defendant, if defendant is using the mark before institution of the suit, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 16, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- SILVERMAPLE HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS ….. Plaintiffs Versus DR AJAY DUBEY & ORS. ….. Defendants Date of Order:- 24.08.2023 Case of the Plaintiff:-…

advocate affidavit application brand complaint copyright court damages decree defendant delhi duplcate Gujarat Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle Registrar search seizure services similar trademark well known mark

Opinion of Registrar of Trademarks is mandatory for Police search & seizure raid on duplicate products,Gujarat High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 14, 2023 No Comments

MIHIR SURENDRABHAI SHAH …..Petitioner Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & others ……Respondents Date of Order:- 31.07.2023 What the Petition is all about ? That the petitioner was in business of selling…

advocate affidavit application assessment assets brand copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence high court Income tax Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order petitoner respondent services tax trademark

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 13, 2023 No Comments

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, CHANDIGARH ….. Appellant Versus M/S KUANTUM PAPERS LTD. ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 16.08.2023 This was an Income Tax appeal concerning Assessment Year (AY)…

advocate affidavit application brand copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain evidence gogia goods high court injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website well known mark

Documentary Evidence is enough to declare a trademark as a well known mark, affidavit is not mandatory, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 11, 2023 No Comments

KAMDHENU LTD ….. Appellant Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ….. Respondent Date of the Order:- 06.07.2023 APPELLANT STORY:- The Appellant’s story is that appellant is a company, incorporated as…

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

Directions issued by Delhi High Court for proper Mechanism to conduct, online hearing at Trademark office.

Cross Examination through Video Conferencing allowed by Delhi High Court in IPR cases/ Commercial Disputes for overseas & outstation witness.

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

No Trademark, ad interim Injunction-without hearing the defendant, if defendant is using the mark before institution of the suit, Delhi High Court.

Opinion of Registrar of Trademarks is mandatory for Police search & seizure raid on duplicate products,Gujarat High Court.

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS