rights

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate November 18, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of :- PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED …..APPELLANTS Versus KARANVEER SINGH CHHABRA TRADING AS J.K. ENTERPRISES …..RESPONDENT Date of the Order: – 03.11.2023 REASON FOR FILING THE…

acronym act actor advocate affidavit Appeal applicant application assets brand Confidential copyright court cyber damages decree deed defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions duplicate evidence goods goodwill grounds hearing high court Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo online order passing off personality petitoner plaintiff prima facie Registrar registry rights trademark writ

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 30, 2023 0Comment

This post is about seven trademarks and their journey from owner to liquidator then to wrongful owner and then again back to the liquidator. This post proves that how people…

act Appeal applicant application brand confusingly consumer court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions duplicate fake generic goods goodwill grounds hearing high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo medicine online order passing off plaintiff Registrar respondent rights services similar trademark

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 28, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of :- SUN PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES LTD. ….. Appellant Versus HETERO HEALTHCARE LTD. & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 26.08.2022 APPEAL BEFORE DOUBLE BENCH OF HON’BLE DELHI…

act advocate affidavit Appeal applicant application brand court delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt email gogia high court Intellectual Property intelligence judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order petitoner plaintiff Registrar rights served summons trademark

U/s 143 of Trade Mark Act, there is No legal compulsion on applicant or opponent to provide email id to Trademark office, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 27, 2023 0Comment

M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD. 9TH KILOMETER, MEX ESTATE, PATHANKOT ROAD, JALANDHAR ….. Appellant Versus VIKRAM SURI TRADING AS M/S ARMEX AUTO INDUSTRIES ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 13.10.2023 An…

act advocate applicant application brand defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions grounds high court Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle Registrar rights trademark

Registrar of trade marks should mandatorily provide grounds of refusal of trade mark application to the applicant, Delhi High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 25, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of:- Intellectual Property Attorneys ……Petitioner Versus The Controller General of Patents, Designs, & Trade marks & Anr. ….Respondents Date of Order:- 16.10.2019 Reason for Petition The petitioner…

actor advocate affidavit application artificial brand Confidential confusingly consumer court cyber damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions domain duplicate email evidence fake garments goods goodwill high court image infringement injunction Intellectual Property internet judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media passing off personality Registrar rights trademark website well known mark

Bollywood Actor’s personality rights protected by High Court of Delhi.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 24, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of: ANIL KAPOOR ….. Plaintiff Versus SIMPLY LIFE INDIA & ORS. ….. Defendants Date of Order: – 20.09.2023 CASE OF FILM ACTOR’S PERSONALITY RIGHTS. The Plaintiff is…

rights

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

U/s 143 of Trade Mark Act, there is No legal compulsion on applicant or opponent to provide email id to Trademark office, Delhi High Court.

Registrar of trade marks should mandatorily provide grounds of refusal of trade mark application to the applicant, Delhi High Court

Bollywood Actor’s personality rights protected by High Court of Delhi.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS