petitoner

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 30, 2023 No Comments

This post is about seven trademarks and their journey from owner to liquidator then to wrongful owner and then again back to the liquidator. This post proves that how people…

act advocate affidavit Appeal applicant application brand court delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt email gogia high court Intellectual Property intelligence judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order petitoner plaintiff Registrar rights served summons trademark

U/s 143 of Trade Mark Act, there is No legal compulsion on applicant or opponent to provide email id to Trademark office, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 27, 2023 No Comments

M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD. 9TH KILOMETER, MEX ESTATE, PATHANKOT ROAD, JALANDHAR ….. Appellant Versus VIKRAM SURI TRADING AS M/S ARMEX AUTO INDUSTRIES ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 13.10.2023 An…

act advocate affidavit applicant application brand complaint court delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions hearing judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle online order petitoner plaintiff Registrar respondent services trademark

Directions issued by Delhi High Court for proper Mechanism to conduct, online hearing at Trademark office.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 26, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- PAWANDEEP SINGH ….. Petitioner Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of order:-23.03.2022 Writ filed by applicant of trademark,as his trademark application…

acronym advertisement advocate application book confusingly consumer copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence goods high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off petitoner plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 18, 2023 No Comments

M/S.RSPL HEALTH PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Petitioner Versus RECKITT AND COLMAN (OVERSEAS) HYGIENE HOME LIMITED & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 22.08.2023 HARPIC DRAINXPERT VERSUS XPERT There were two rectification…

advocate affidavit application assessment assets brand copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence high court Income tax Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order petitoner respondent services tax trademark

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 13, 2023 No Comments

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, CHANDIGARH ….. Appellant Versus M/S KUANTUM PAPERS LTD. ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 16.08.2023 This was an Income Tax appeal concerning Assessment Year (AY)…

advocate bank brand cheating complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain fake gogia high court infringement Intellectual Property law lawyer legal lexeagle order petitoner plaintiff summons trademark

Delhi High Court issues notices to 24 banks in relation to domain names infringing well known trademarks

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 6, 2023 No Comments

IN THE MATTERS OF:- 1.DABUR INDIA LIMITED …..Plaintiff Versus ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS …..Defendants 2.TATA SKY LIMITED …..Plaintiff Versus S G ENTERPREISES – TATA SKY SALES AND SERVICES AND ORS.…

advocate brand complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt domain fake gogia high court infringement Intellectual Property intelligence law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order petitoner plaintiff respondent trademark

Use of registered trademark is an important factor, injunction vacated by Karnataka High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 5, 2023 No Comments

BLINK COMMERCE PRIVATE LIMITED …..APPELLANT Versus BLINKHIT PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..…RESPONDENTS Date of order:- 17.04.2023 What is the case about:- This is an Appeal by Blink Commerce Private Limited…

advocate complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions fake garments high court infringement Intellectual Property law lawyer legal lexeagle Madras order petitoner respondent

Sec 63 of Copyright Act does not apply to counterfeit garments etc, Madras High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 3, 2023 No Comments

Chain Singh & Sujan Singh ….Petitioners Versus State & anr. …..Respondent Date of Order:- 07.06.2023 Reason for Filing Petition The petition was filed in Hon’ble Madras High Court , to…

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

U/s 143 of Trade Mark Act, there is No legal compulsion on applicant or opponent to provide email id to Trademark office, Delhi High Court.

Directions issued by Delhi High Court for proper Mechanism to conduct, online hearing at Trademark office.

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Delhi High Court issues notices to 24 banks in relation to domain names infringing well known trademarks

Use of registered trademark is an important factor, injunction vacated by Karnataka High Court

Sec 63 of Copyright Act does not apply to counterfeit garments etc, Madras High Court

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS