logo

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 18, 2023 No Comments

M/S.RSPL HEALTH PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Petitioner Versus RECKITT AND COLMAN (OVERSEAS) HYGIENE HOME LIMITED & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 22.08.2023 HARPIC DRAINXPERT VERSUS XPERT There were two rectification…

advertisement advocate application bombay complaint copyright court decree delhi evidence goodwill high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media passing off plaintiff respondent sales search supreme court

Supreme Court on passing off, acquiescence and cross examination.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 17, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited …..Appellants versus Yashwantrao Mohite Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ………Respondents Date of Order:-04.09.2023 STORY LINE:- The appellant–plaintiff was engaged in…

advocate application brand Confidential copyright court damages decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off plaintiff services similar trademark

No Trademark, ad interim Injunction-without hearing the defendant, if defendant is using the mark before institution of the suit, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 16, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- SILVERMAPLE HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS ….. Plaintiffs Versus DR AJAY DUBEY & ORS. ….. Defendants Date of Order:- 24.08.2023 Case of the Plaintiff:-…

advocate affidavit application assessment assets brand copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence high court Income tax Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order petitoner respondent services tax trademark

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 13, 2023 No Comments

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, CHANDIGARH ….. Appellant Versus M/S KUANTUM PAPERS LTD. ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 16.08.2023 This was an Income Tax appeal concerning Assessment Year (AY)…

advocate affidavit application brand copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain evidence gogia goods high court injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website well known mark

Documentary Evidence is enough to declare a trademark as a well known mark, affidavit is not mandatory, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 11, 2023 No Comments

KAMDHENU LTD ….. Appellant Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ….. Respondent Date of the Order:- 06.07.2023 APPELLANT STORY:- The Appellant’s story is that appellant is a company, incorporated as…

advocate brand copyright court damages defamation defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions fake high court image Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo Madras order passing off plaintiff similar summons trademark website youtube

Trademark defamed by youtuber, damages claimed by Trademark owner, Madras High Court grants permanent injunction and damages to trademark owner.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 10, 2023 No Comments

M/s.Kaleeshwari Refinery Private Limited …..Plaintiff Versus Akshay A ,Youtube Channel, ‘DiCapScoop” ….Defendant Date of order :- 25.09.2023 WHO IS THE PLAINTIFF The plaintiff claimed to leading market leader in the…

advocate brand copyright court cyber damages decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain email gogia high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off trademark website

Rs.2 Crore awarded to Adobe as damages against habitual cyber squatter and domain name infringer by Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 9, 2023 No Comments

ADOBE, INC ….. Plaintiff Versus NAMASE PATEL AND OTHERS ….. Defendants Date of the order:- 29.11.2022 PLAINITFF’S INTRO Plaintiff was founded in 1982 and it is the second largest US…

advocate brand copyright court damages decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt domain fake infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off plaintiff similar summons trademark website

Rs.two lakh awarded as damages to Ebay in a trademark infringement case by Delhi High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 8, 2023 No Comments

EBAY, INC …Plaintiff Versus MOHD. WASEEM T/AS SHOPIBAY & ORS. …..Defendants Date of Order:- 17.11.2022 REASON FOR FILING THE PRESENT CASE The present suit was filed by Ebay Inc/plaintiff to…

advocate artificial Bhagvad Geeta book brand complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain fake gogia high court infringement Intellectual Property intelligence law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order plaintiff trademark Whatsapp youtube

Original interpretation by Authors of ancient scpritures can be protected under copyright act, Delhi High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 7, 2023 No Comments

THE BHAKTIVEDANTA BOOK TRUST, INDIA ….Plaintiff Versus HTTPS://BHAGAVATAM.IN/#GSC.TAB=0 & ORS. ….Defendants Date of Order:- 21.09.2023 The Plaintiff in the present case was – Bhaktivedanta Book Trust which is a trust…

advocate brand complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt domain fake gogia high court infringement Intellectual Property intelligence law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order petitoner plaintiff respondent trademark

Use of registered trademark is an important factor, injunction vacated by Karnataka High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 5, 2023 No Comments

BLINK COMMERCE PRIVATE LIMITED …..APPELLANT Versus BLINKHIT PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..…RESPONDENTS Date of order:- 17.04.2023 What is the case about:- This is an Appeal by Blink Commerce Private Limited…

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Supreme Court on passing off, acquiescence and cross examination.

No Trademark, ad interim Injunction-without hearing the defendant, if defendant is using the mark before institution of the suit, Delhi High Court.

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Trademark defamed by youtuber, damages claimed by Trademark owner, Madras High Court grants permanent injunction and damages to trademark owner.

Rs.2 Crore awarded to Adobe as damages against habitual cyber squatter and domain name infringer by Delhi High Court.

Rs.two lakh awarded as damages to Ebay in a trademark infringement case by Delhi High Court

Original interpretation by Authors of ancient scpritures can be protected under copyright act, Delhi High Court

Use of registered trademark is an important factor, injunction vacated by Karnataka High Court

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS