law

Delhi High Court on Acronym war, ICAI versus ICAI

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate September 25, 2023 No Comments

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA ….Plaintiff Versus THE INSTITUTE OF COST ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA .. Defendant Date of Order:- 21.03.2023 PLAINTIFF The plaintiff was, The Institute of Chartered…

advocate cheating complaint court delhi delhihighcourt directions gogia high court law lawyer legal lexeagle marriage rape Whatsapp

Delhi High Court issued guildelines for trial/District courts, while granting bail to accused.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate September 24, 2023 No Comments

xxxxx ….Petitioner Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ……Respondents Order Dated:- 13.09.2023 REASON FOR FILING PRESENT PETITION The present petition was filed u/s 482 of the Code…

advocate copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt gogia high court infringement Intellectual Property law lawyer legal lexeagle plaintiff summons trademark

Google LLC awarded Rs.10 Lakh as Damages in a Trademark Suit.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate September 5, 2023 No Comments

GOOGLE LLC ….. Plaintiff Versus GOOGLE ENTERPRISES PVT TLD & ORS ….. Defendants Order dated:- 02/07/2023 PLAINTIFF STORY & HISTORY Date:- 06.09.2023 Place:-Delhi Read, Reviewed & Edited by NEERAJ GOGIA,…

advocate copyright court defamation defendant delhi delhihighcourt gogia high court Intellectual Property law lawyer legal lexeagle plaintiff summons trademark youtube

Delhi High Court restrains youtubers from posting defamatory contents against MBA Chaiwala

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate September 4, 2023 No Comments

Delhi High Court PRAFUL BILLORE & ANR. ….Plainiffs Versus BAEROJGAR & ORS. …..Defendants Order dated:- 28.08.2023 DATE:- 04.08.2023 PLACE:- DELHI READ, REVIEWED & EDITED BY NEERAJ GOGIA, ADVOCATE 9891800100 [email protected]

advocate court delhi delhihighcourt gogia high court Intellectual Property law lawyer legal lexeagle trademark

Chat GPT cannot replace human intelligence, Delhi High Court in a Trademark Suit

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate September 3, 2023 No Comments

Delhi High Court In the matter of:- CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SAS & ANR ….Plaintiffs Versus M/S THE SHOE BOUTIQUE – SHUTIQ …..Defendant Order Dated:- 22.08.2023 Case of Plaintiffs Date:-04.09.2023 Place:- Delhi…

court high court law legal lexeagle

Live-in-relationship shall only be considered as normal after the institution of marriage becomes obsolete in India, Allahabad High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate September 2, 2023 No Comments

Adnan ….Applicant Versus State Of U.P. ……Opposite Party Order dated:- 29.08.2023 Basis :-Adnan filed a bail application, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case No. 156 of…

copyright Intellectual Property law legal

Varah Roopam song and Copyright cases.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate February 11, 2023 No Comments

In October,2022, Kerala Court passed an order, restraining Kantara Movie from using the song,’ Varah roopam’ because a Kerala based rock band Thaikkudam Bridge, who said that the song has…

law legal

In cheque bouncing case, IT return of Complainant is important to show financial capacity of Complainant.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate February 3, 2023 No Comments

RAJARAM S/O SRIRAMULU NAIDU (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS.versusMARUTHACHALAM (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS. The Criminal Appeals challenge the common judgment and order of convictionand sentence dated 28th October 2008 and 30th…

Delhi High Court on Acronym war, ICAI versus ICAI

Delhi High Court issued guildelines for trial/District courts, while granting bail to accused.

Google LLC awarded Rs.10 Lakh as Damages in a Trademark Suit.

Delhi High Court restrains youtubers from posting defamatory contents against MBA Chaiwala

Chat GPT cannot replace human intelligence, Delhi High Court in a Trademark Suit

Live-in-relationship shall only be considered as normal after the institution of marriage becomes obsolete in India, Allahabad High Court.

Varah Roopam song and Copyright cases.

In cheque bouncing case, IT return of Complainant is important to show financial capacity of Complainant.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS