judgment

Cross Examination through Video Conferencing allowed by Delhi High Court in IPR cases/ Commercial Disputes for overseas & outstation witness.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 21, 2023 No Comments

In the matters of:- INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV …..Petitioner Versus QUESS CORP LIMITED …..Respondent With M/S QUESS CORP LTD …..Petitioner Versus M/S INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV …..Respondent Date of Order:-…

advocate agreement copyright court damages delhi Delhi High Court directions franchise gogia goodwill high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off plaintiff Registrar school student trademark well known mark writ

Delhi High Court grants relief to Delhi Public School for its DPS trademark & Logo.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 20, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of:- DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ….. Plaintiff Versus AVIRAL EDUCATION WELFAREAND CULTURAL SOCIETY AND ANR ….. Defendants Date of Order:- 16.10.2023 DPS Trademark Versus DPS Trademark Plaintiff…

advocate affidavit application brand complaint Confidential confusingly consumer copyright court damages decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain email goodwill high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off similar summons trademark website well known mark

Online platforms like Meesho, should ensure that complete details of the sellers are available on its platform, Delhi High Court said in a Copyright infringement matter.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 19, 2023 No Comments

TIBRA COLLECTION ….. Plaintiff Versus FASHNEAR TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. ….. Defendants Date of Order:- 27.09.2023 PLAINTIFF’S CASE The case of the Plaintiff was that the Plaintiff is a…

acronym advertisement advocate application book confusingly consumer copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence goods high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off petitoner plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 18, 2023 No Comments

M/S.RSPL HEALTH PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Petitioner Versus RECKITT AND COLMAN (OVERSEAS) HYGIENE HOME LIMITED & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 22.08.2023 HARPIC DRAINXPERT VERSUS XPERT There were two rectification…

advertisement advocate application bombay complaint copyright court decree delhi evidence goodwill high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media passing off plaintiff respondent sales search supreme court

Supreme Court on passing off, acquiescence and cross examination.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 17, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited …..Appellants versus Yashwantrao Mohite Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ………Respondents Date of Order:-04.09.2023 STORY LINE:- The appellant–plaintiff was engaged in…

advocate application brand Confidential copyright court damages decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off plaintiff services similar trademark

No Trademark, ad interim Injunction-without hearing the defendant, if defendant is using the mark before institution of the suit, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 16, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- SILVERMAPLE HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS ….. Plaintiffs Versus DR AJAY DUBEY & ORS. ….. Defendants Date of Order:- 24.08.2023 Case of the Plaintiff:-…

advocate affidavit application brand complaint copyright court damages decree defendant delhi duplcate Gujarat Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle Registrar search seizure services similar trademark well known mark

Opinion of Registrar of Trademarks is mandatory for Police search & seizure raid on duplicate products,Gujarat High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 14, 2023 No Comments

MIHIR SURENDRABHAI SHAH …..Petitioner Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & others ……Respondents Date of Order:- 31.07.2023 What the Petition is all about ? That the petitioner was in business of selling…

advocate affidavit application assessment assets brand copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence high court Income tax Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order petitoner respondent services tax trademark

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 13, 2023 No Comments

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, CHANDIGARH ….. Appellant Versus M/S KUANTUM PAPERS LTD. ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 16.08.2023 This was an Income Tax appeal concerning Assessment Year (AY)…

advocate application brand copyright court damages defendant domain facebook group high court injunction judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle plaintiff trademark website

Dispute over Ownership of facebook group does not amount to Intellectual property dispute, Bombay High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 12, 2023 No Comments

The Himalayan Club ..Appellant/Applicant Versus Kanwar B. Singh & Ors. ..Respondents Date of the order:- 24.03.2023 REASON FOR APPEAL The present appeal was filed in Bombay High Court against the…

advocate affidavit application brand copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain evidence gogia goods high court injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website well known mark

Documentary Evidence is enough to declare a trademark as a well known mark, affidavit is not mandatory, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 11, 2023 No Comments

KAMDHENU LTD ….. Appellant Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ….. Respondent Date of the Order:- 06.07.2023 APPELLANT STORY:- The Appellant’s story is that appellant is a company, incorporated as…

Cross Examination through Video Conferencing allowed by Delhi High Court in IPR cases/ Commercial Disputes for overseas & outstation witness.

Delhi High Court grants relief to Delhi Public School for its DPS trademark & Logo.

Online platforms like Meesho, should ensure that complete details of the sellers are available on its platform, Delhi High Court said in a Copyright infringement matter.

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Supreme Court on passing off, acquiescence and cross examination.

No Trademark, ad interim Injunction-without hearing the defendant, if defendant is using the mark before institution of the suit, Delhi High Court.

Opinion of Registrar of Trademarks is mandatory for Police search & seizure raid on duplicate products,Gujarat High Court.

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS