intelligence

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate April 1, 2024 No Comments

WESTERN INFRABUILD PRODUCTS LLP ….. Plaintiff Versus M/S. WESTERN STEEL INDIA & ANR. … Defendants Date of Order:- 05.01.2022 JOINT SETTLEMENT APPLICATION BY PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT The settlement application was…

act advertisement advocate affidavit agreement Appeal applicant application Bhagvad Geeta book brand complaint Confidential confusingly court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions domain email facebook franchise goods goodwill high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property intelligence internet judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media online order passing off plaintiff Registrar registry rights sales search services similar summons trademark website well known mark

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate November 18, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED …..APPELLANTS Versus KARANVEER SINGH CHHABRA TRADING AS J.K. ENTERPRISES …..RESPONDENT Date of the Order: – 03.11.2023 REASON FOR FILING THE…

act advocate affidavit Appeal applicant application brand court delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt email gogia high court Intellectual Property intelligence judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order petitoner plaintiff Registrar rights served summons trademark

U/s 143 of Trade Mark Act, there is No legal compulsion on applicant or opponent to provide email id to Trademark office, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 27, 2023 No Comments

M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD. 9TH KILOMETER, MEX ESTATE, PATHANKOT ROAD, JALANDHAR ….. Appellant Versus VIKRAM SURI TRADING AS M/S ARMEX AUTO INDUSTRIES ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 13.10.2023 An…

advocate artificial Bhagvad Geeta book brand complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain fake gogia high court infringement Intellectual Property intelligence law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order plaintiff trademark Whatsapp youtube

Original interpretation by Authors of ancient scpritures can be protected under copyright act, Delhi High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 7, 2023 No Comments

THE BHAKTIVEDANTA BOOK TRUST, INDIA ….Plaintiff Versus HTTPS://BHAGAVATAM.IN/#GSC.TAB=0 & ORS. ….Defendants Date of Order:- 21.09.2023 The Plaintiff in the present case was – Bhaktivedanta Book Trust which is a trust…

advocate brand complaint copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt domain fake gogia high court infringement Intellectual Property intelligence law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order petitoner plaintiff respondent trademark

Use of registered trademark is an important factor, injunction vacated by Karnataka High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 5, 2023 No Comments

BLINK COMMERCE PRIVATE LIMITED …..APPELLANT Versus BLINKHIT PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR ..…RESPONDENTS Date of order:- 17.04.2023 What is the case about:- This is an Appeal by Blink Commerce Private Limited…

advocate bank cheating copyright court delhi delhihighcourt directions domain fake franchise high court infringement Intellectual Property intelligence law lawyer legal lexeagle order plaintiff trademark

Fake Franchise seller of Trademark ‘Burger King’ restrained by Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 2, 2023 No Comments

BURGER KING CORPORATION …..Plaintiff Versus SWAPNIL PATIL & ORS. …..Defendants Date of the Order:- 15.09.2023 Who is the plaintiff? Plaintiff- Burger King Corporation seeking protection of its marks ‘BURGER KING’…

advocate artificial book copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions high court infringement Intellectual Property intelligence law lawyer legal lexeagle plaintiff school summons trademark

In a Copyright Infringement matter author of school books summoned by Delhi High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 1, 2023 No Comments

KARTIK SHARMA …..Plaintiff Versus SULTAN CHAND AND SONS PVT. LTD. & ORS ……Defendant Date of Order:- 23.08.2023 Reason for filing suit The present suit was filed seeking a permanent injunction…

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

U/s 143 of Trade Mark Act, there is No legal compulsion on applicant or opponent to provide email id to Trademark office, Delhi High Court.

Original interpretation by Authors of ancient scpritures can be protected under copyright act, Delhi High Court

Use of registered trademark is an important factor, injunction vacated by Karnataka High Court

Fake Franchise seller of Trademark ‘Burger King’ restrained by Delhi High Court.

In a Copyright Infringement matter author of school books summoned by Delhi High Court

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS