goods

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate April 1, 2024 0Comment

WESTERN INFRABUILD PRODUCTS LLP ….. Plaintiff Versus M/S. WESTERN STEEL INDIA & ANR. … Defendants Date of Order:- 05.01.2022 JOINT SETTLEMENT APPLICATION BY PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT The settlement application was…

act advertisement advocate affidavit agreement Appeal applicant application Bhagvad Geeta book brand complaint Confidential confusingly court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions domain email facebook franchise goods goodwill high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property intelligence internet judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media online order passing off plaintiff Registrar registry rights sales search services similar summons trademark website well known mark

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate November 18, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of :- PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED …..APPELLANTS Versus KARANVEER SINGH CHHABRA TRADING AS J.K. ENTERPRISES …..RESPONDENT Date of the Order: – 03.11.2023 REASON FOR FILING THE…

acronym act actor advocate affidavit Appeal applicant application assets brand Confidential copyright court cyber damages decree deed defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions duplicate evidence goods goodwill grounds hearing high court Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo online order passing off personality petitoner plaintiff prima facie Registrar registry rights trademark writ

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 30, 2023 0Comment

This post is about seven trademarks and their journey from owner to liquidator then to wrongful owner and then again back to the liquidator. This post proves that how people…

act Appeal applicant application brand confusingly consumer court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions duplicate fake generic goods goodwill grounds hearing high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo medicine online order passing off plaintiff Registrar respondent rights services similar trademark

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 28, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of :- SUN PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES LTD. ….. Appellant Versus HETERO HEALTHCARE LTD. & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 26.08.2022 APPEAL BEFORE DOUBLE BENCH OF HON’BLE DELHI…

actor advocate affidavit application artificial brand Confidential confusingly consumer court cyber damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions domain duplicate email evidence fake garments goods goodwill high court image infringement injunction Intellectual Property internet judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media passing off personality Registrar rights trademark website well known mark

Bollywood Actor’s personality rights protected by High Court of Delhi.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 24, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of: ANIL KAPOOR ….. Plaintiff Versus SIMPLY LIFE INDIA & ORS. ….. Defendants Date of Order: – 20.09.2023 CASE OF FILM ACTOR’S PERSONALITY RIGHTS. The Plaintiff is…

advertisement advocate affidavit agreement application assets brand Confidential confusingly consumer copyright court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions evidence fake goods high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle order passing off plaintiff services supreme court trademark website

Cross Examination through Video Conferencing allowed by Delhi High Court in IPR cases/ Commercial Disputes for overseas & outstation witness.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 21, 2023 0Comment

In the matters of:- INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV …..Petitioner Versus QUESS CORP LIMITED …..Respondent With M/S QUESS CORP LTD …..Petitioner Versus M/S INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV …..Respondent Date of Order:-…

acronym advertisement advocate application book confusingly consumer copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence goods high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off petitoner plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 18, 2023 0Comment

M/S.RSPL HEALTH PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Petitioner Versus RECKITT AND COLMAN (OVERSEAS) HYGIENE HOME LIMITED & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 22.08.2023 HARPIC DRAINXPERT VERSUS XPERT There were two rectification…

advocate affidavit application brand copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain evidence gogia goods high court injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website well known mark

Documentary Evidence is enough to declare a trademark as a well known mark, affidavit is not mandatory, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 11, 2023 0Comment

KAMDHENU LTD ….. Appellant Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ….. Respondent Date of the Order:- 06.07.2023 APPELLANT STORY:- The Appellant’s story is that appellant is a company, incorporated as…

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

‘LETROZ’ & ‘LETERO’ medicine are not similar as they derive from same generic drug named as ‘LETEROZOLE’, Delhi High Court.

Bollywood Actor’s personality rights protected by High Court of Delhi.

Cross Examination through Video Conferencing allowed by Delhi High Court in IPR cases/ Commercial Disputes for overseas & outstation witness.

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS