evidence

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 30, 2023 No Comments

This post is about seven trademarks and their journey from owner to liquidator then to wrongful owner and then again back to the liquidator. This post proves that how people…

actor advocate affidavit application artificial brand Confidential confusingly consumer court cyber damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions domain duplicate email evidence fake garments goods goodwill high court image infringement injunction Intellectual Property internet judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media passing off personality Registrar rights trademark website well known mark

Bollywood Actor’s personality rights protected by High Court of Delhi.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 24, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of: ANIL KAPOOR ….. Plaintiff Versus SIMPLY LIFE INDIA & ORS. ….. Defendants Date of Order: – 20.09.2023 CASE OF FILM ACTOR’S PERSONALITY RIGHTS. The Plaintiff is…

advocate agreement application brand confusingly copyright court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions domain duplicate email evidence facebook fake food franchise goodwill high court image infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off plaintiff Registrar sales similar trademark website well known mark

‘SUBWAY‘ and ‘SUBERB’ are not similar trademarks, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 23, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of SUBWAY IP LLC …..Plaintiff Versus INFINITY FOOD & ORS. …..Defendants Date of Order:-12.01.2023 PLAINTIFF The plaintiff was Subway IP LLC a Company incorporated in the State…

advertisement advocate affidavit agreement application brand Confidential confusingly consumer copyright court damages decree Delhi High Court directions domain duplicate evidence fake franchise goodwill high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off plaintiff search similar summons trademark website well known mark

‘Miss India’ trademark owners got Permanent Injunction & Passing off order in their favour by Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 22, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- BENNETT, COLEMAN AND COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. ….. Plaintiffs Versus PLANET MEDIA GROUP & ORS. ….. Defendants Date of the Order:- 20.04.2023 Who are the…

advertisement advocate affidavit agreement application assets brand Confidential confusingly consumer copyright court damages decree defendant delhi Delhi High Court delhihighcourt directions evidence fake goods high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle order passing off plaintiff services supreme court trademark website

Cross Examination through Video Conferencing allowed by Delhi High Court in IPR cases/ Commercial Disputes for overseas & outstation witness.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 21, 2023 No Comments

In the matters of:- INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV …..Petitioner Versus QUESS CORP LIMITED …..Respondent With M/S QUESS CORP LTD …..Petitioner Versus M/S INTER IKEA SYSTEMS BV …..Respondent Date of Order:-…

acronym advertisement advocate application book confusingly consumer copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence goods high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off petitoner plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 18, 2023 No Comments

M/S.RSPL HEALTH PRIVATE LIMITED ….. Petitioner Versus RECKITT AND COLMAN (OVERSEAS) HYGIENE HOME LIMITED & ANR. ….. Respondents Date of Order:- 22.08.2023 HARPIC DRAINXPERT VERSUS XPERT There were two rectification…

advertisement advocate application bombay complaint copyright court decree delhi evidence goodwill high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media passing off plaintiff respondent sales search supreme court

Supreme Court on passing off, acquiescence and cross examination.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 17, 2023 No Comments

In the matter of :- Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited …..Appellants versus Yashwantrao Mohite Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ………Respondents Date of Order:-04.09.2023 STORY LINE:- The appellant–plaintiff was engaged in…

advocate affidavit application assessment assets brand copyright court defendant delhi delhihighcourt evidence high court Income tax Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order petitoner respondent services tax trademark

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 13, 2023 No Comments

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, CHANDIGARH ….. Appellant Versus M/S KUANTUM PAPERS LTD. ….. Respondent Date of Order:- 16.08.2023 This was an Income Tax appeal concerning Assessment Year (AY)…

advocate affidavit application brand copyright court decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain evidence gogia goods high court injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo media order plaintiff Registrar respondent services similar trademark website well known mark

Documentary Evidence is enough to declare a trademark as a well known mark, affidavit is not mandatory, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 11, 2023 No Comments

KAMDHENU LTD ….. Appellant Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ….. Respondent Date of the Order:- 06.07.2023 APPELLANT STORY:- The Appellant’s story is that appellant is a company, incorporated as…

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS

Bollywood Actor’s personality rights protected by High Court of Delhi.

‘SUBWAY‘ and ‘SUBERB’ are not similar trademarks, Delhi High Court.

‘Miss India’ trademark owners got Permanent Injunction & Passing off order in their favour by Delhi High Court.

Cross Examination through Video Conferencing allowed by Delhi High Court in IPR cases/ Commercial Disputes for overseas & outstation witness.

“HARPIC DRAINXPERT” trademark is not confusingly similar to “XPERT” trademark and consumer are not likely to be confused with both marks, Delhi High Court.

Supreme Court on passing off, acquiescence and cross examination.

Brand Names are intangible assets and can be depreciated under Income tax Act.

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS