damages

No Trademark, ad interim Injunction-without hearing the defendant, if defendant is using the mark before institution of the suit, Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 16, 2023 0Comment

In the matter of :- SILVERMAPLE HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS ….. Plaintiffs Versus DR AJAY DUBEY & ORS. ….. Defendants Date of Order:- 24.08.2023 Case of the Plaintiff:-…

advocate affidavit application brand complaint copyright court damages decree defendant delhi duplcate Gujarat Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle Registrar search seizure services similar trademark well known mark

Opinion of Registrar of Trademarks is mandatory for Police search & seizure raid on duplicate products,Gujarat High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 14, 2023 0Comment

MIHIR SURENDRABHAI SHAH …..Petitioner Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & others ……Respondents Date of Order:- 31.07.2023 What the Petition is all about ? That the petitioner was in business of selling…

advocate application brand copyright court damages defendant domain facebook group high court injunction judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle plaintiff trademark website

Dispute over Ownership of facebook group does not amount to Intellectual property dispute, Bombay High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 12, 2023 0Comment

The Himalayan Club ..Appellant/Applicant Versus Kanwar B. Singh & Ors. ..Respondents Date of the order:- 24.03.2023 REASON FOR APPEAL The present appeal was filed in Bombay High Court against the…

advocate brand copyright court damages defamation defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions fake high court image Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo Madras order passing off plaintiff similar summons trademark website youtube

Trademark defamed by youtuber, damages claimed by Trademark owner, Madras High Court grants permanent injunction and damages to trademark owner.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 10, 2023 0Comment

M/s.Kaleeshwari Refinery Private Limited …..Plaintiff Versus Akshay A ,Youtube Channel, ‘DiCapScoop” ….Defendant Date of order :- 25.09.2023 WHO IS THE PLAINTIFF The plaintiff claimed to leading market leader in the…

advocate brand copyright court cyber damages decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt directions domain email gogia high court infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off trademark website

Rs.2 Crore awarded to Adobe as damages against habitual cyber squatter and domain name infringer by Delhi High Court.

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 9, 2023 0Comment

ADOBE, INC ….. Plaintiff Versus NAMASE PATEL AND OTHERS ….. Defendants Date of the order:- 29.11.2022 PLAINITFF’S INTRO Plaintiff was founded in 1982 and it is the second largest US…

advocate brand copyright court damages decree defendant delhi delhihighcourt domain fake infringement injunction Intellectual Property judgment law lawyer legal lexeagle logo order passing off plaintiff similar summons trademark website

Rs.two lakh awarded as damages to Ebay in a trademark infringement case by Delhi High Court

Neeraj Gogia, Advocate October 8, 2023 0Comment

EBAY, INC …Plaintiff Versus MOHD. WASEEM T/AS SHOPIBAY & ORS. …..Defendants Date of Order:- 17.11.2022 REASON FOR FILING THE PRESENT CASE The present suit was filed by Ebay Inc/plaintiff to…

damages

No Trademark, ad interim Injunction-without hearing the defendant, if defendant is using the mark before institution of the suit, Delhi High Court.

Opinion of Registrar of Trademarks is mandatory for Police search & seizure raid on duplicate products,Gujarat High Court.

Trademark defamed by youtuber, damages claimed by Trademark owner, Madras High Court grants permanent injunction and damages to trademark owner.

Rs.2 Crore awarded to Adobe as damages against habitual cyber squatter and domain name infringer by Delhi High Court.

Rs.two lakh awarded as damages to Ebay in a trademark infringement case by Delhi High Court

You Missed

In a Marriage dispute, names of family members cannot be included when no active involvement is proved , High Court of Karnataka

Delhi High Court refunded full court fees in out of court settlement by parties in a trademark infringement matter.

‘London Pride’ trademark is not similar to ‘Blenders Pride’ trademark, as the word ‘Pride’ is of common usage.

THE SAGA OF SEVEN TRADEMARKS